Critical notice: Darwinian reductionism
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
CRITICAL NOTICE Presentism and Relativity*
In this critical notice we argue against William Craig’s recent attempt to reconcile presentism (roughly, the view that only the present is real) with relativity theory. Craig’s defense of his position boils down to endorsing a ‘neo-Lorentzian interpretation’ of special relativity. We contend that his reconstruction of Lorentz’s theory and its historical development is fatally flawed and that h...
متن کاملCritical Notice Rational Starting Points
Epistemic justification has been claimed to be a special case of argument by philosophers such as Accordingly for each attempt, epistemic justification is the occasion of the arguer making a case for some conclusion based on other premises, when the audience and the arguer are the same person. The dialectical model of argument is used to inform how it is that a subject could come to justify her...
متن کاملCritical Notice Getting Clear about Equivocal Concepts
Just how far can externalism go? In this exciting new book Ruth Millikan explores a radically externalist treatment of empirical concepts. For the last thirty years philosophy of mind’s ties to meaning internalism have been loosened. The theory of content has swung uncomfortably on its moorings in a fickle current, straining against opposing ties to mind and world. In this book Millikan casts c...
متن کاملCritical notice Logical machines: Peirce on psychologism
This essay discusses Peirce’s appeal to logical machines as an argument against psychologism. It also contends that some of Peirce’s anti-psychologistic remarks on logic contain interesting premonitions arising from his perception of the asymmetry of proof complexity in monadic and relational logical calculi that were only given full formulation and explication in the early twentieth century th...
متن کاملCRITICAL NOTICE Much Ado About ‘Something’
Though verificationism and related positivist projects are generally seen as discredited, the constitutive distrust of metaphysics is still felt in contemporary contexts. This is abundantly clear in Metametaphysics, where many contributors aim to revive, one way or another, the Carnapian claim that metaphysical debates are either semantically defective (as, e.g., ill-posed or a matter of merely...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Biology & Philosophy
سال: 2007
ISSN: 0169-3867,1572-8404
DOI: 10.1007/s10539-007-9080-z